woensdag 3 februari 2021

The evolution of plants; a natural force for well-being

 The evolution of plants; a natural force for well-being


Botanical research published in the scientific journal Nature Ecology and Evolution shows how the diversity of benefits that plants provide to humans is the result of evolutionary processes that encompass the entire plant Tree of Life.


The history of human civilizations could not be understood without the plants that have contributed to our well-being so much. Besides many other benefits, we have used them for healing, clothing, feeding, and warming ourselves, building and decorating our homes, and even to convey our feelings. As with everything related to biodiversity, these plant services are nothing more than the result of evolution. For example, the pressure exerted by herbivorous insects on plants has driven the evolution of chemical defences, molecules that form the basis of many insecticides. Other species accumulate reserves that we humans use for our own food, and many of them have extraordinarily eye-catching and fragrant flowers that attract pollinators and gardeners alike. One could say that biological evolution is in effect a force for human good. 


The close relationship between the evolutionary history of plants and their benefits to humans has inspired research led by Dr Molina-Venegas from the University of Alcalá (Spain), which suggests that humans have scoured the entirety of the evolutionary tree of plants (i.e. their entire evolutionary history) in search of the botanical benefits that underpin our well-being.


The authors of the study compiled from the latest edition of Mabberley’s Plant-book (Cambridge University Press, 2017) an extensive database of global plant uses, according to 28 categories related to human and livestock nutrition, fuels, materials, medicines, poisons, social and environmental uses. This analysis enabled the authors to conclude that, in general, selecting plants that have widely different evolutionary histories captures a greater number and diversity of benefits than does a strategy based on random sampling or one limited to prospecting solely close relatives. This can be explained by the fact that plant attributes that benefit humans have evolved throughout the plant Tree of Life.


Although the theoretical foundations of such research were formalized in the early 1990s, recent studies have demonstrated that the empirical evidence supporting the theory was still tenuous, and so even questioned its reliability. In supporting the theory, the work led by Dr Molina-Venegas contributes to filling a gap of knowledge that has fueled intense scientific debate in recent years. The conclusion is now clear: taking into account the evolutionary history of species when setting conservation priorities could be the key to ensuring the maximum beneficial potential of biodiversity for the future of humanity.



Brief biographical sketch of the author:


Rafael graduated in biology at the University of Seville, where he completed his PhD on the evolutionary history of plants in the Baetic-Rifan biodiversity hotspot (Andalusia and Northern Morocco). After postdoctoral studies at the University of Alcalá, he moved to the Institute of Plant Science at the University of Bern (Switzerland), where he investigated the relationship between humans and plant benefits from an evolutionary perspective. In 2019, he returned to the University of Alcalá where he is currently leading his own research project, aimed at exploring connections between plant evolutionary history and human well-being.


For correspondence:contact formulary at https://rafmolven.wixsite.com/rafmolven/contact-me




zaterdag 9 januari 2021

How did the cranberries arrive in the Netherlands?

A friendly lady from "Dr. Vogel" explained to me that their hand picked berries came from Denmark. However, later she discovered they import them from New Jersey. 

In New Jersey they also use the dry harvesting method. This farmer explains he prefers this method,since it is healthier for his plants not to "drown" them every year.Eventually that is much better for the quality of the fruits.https://theproducenews.com/sunny-valley-expects-high-quality-new-jersey-cranberry-program.

In the Netherlands they also harvest cranberries.No one knows how they got there:

Probably in 1845 a beachcomber found a barrel. He did not like the sour berries, and threw them in the dunes.All caught by the Terschellinger Webcam 😜

https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cranberry

No, I think they created this movie for the "Terschellinger Cranberies" Company: https://terschellingercranberries.nl/cranberries/geschiedenis/

The berries were found by Holkema in 1868.

https://www.frieseboekhandel.frl/titels/Franciscus-Holkema-H.C.-van-Hall--De-plantengroei-der-Nederlandsche-Noordzee-eilanden/904/9789066595088.htm

Since Holkema died of tuberculosis, before finishing his book. Professor van Hall finished it for him:

https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herman_Christiaan_van_Hall


dinsdag 5 januari 2021

Ericaceae, Cranberries, Harvesting

Cranberries are harvested by flooding he fields. A cranberry has 4 air pockets, so they can  float!

After the flooding, the "Egg Beater" passes by to loosen the berries from the vines.

This method is widely used in New Jersey.

 



Dry harvesting is also used. This farmer explains he uses the dry harvesting, because it keeps his plants healthier and stronger, which results in High Quality Berries.

https://theproducenews.com/sunny-valley-expects-high-quality-new-jersey-cranberry-program

zaterdag 2 januari 2021

Ericaceae, heidefamilie

De heidefamilie (Ericaceae) is een familie van bedektzadige veelal houtige maar ook kruidachtige planten. De familie komt wereldwijd voor, maar zelden in tropisch laagland.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ericaceae


veenbes

vrijdag 1 januari 2021

Vaccinium macrocarpon, veenbes

Vaccinium macrocarpon helpt bij blaasontsteking.

Australian trees growing all over the world

https://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/scienceshow/australian-trees-growing-all-over-the-world/12974558

Robyn Williams: And so to the final in the series of talks we've had from botanist, Professor David Mabberley, formally from the University of Oxford and the Royal Botanic Garden Sydney. This time, how we have massacred the forests ever since Europeans turned up. And land clearing, as you know, has until now given us a get-out-of-jail card in climate accounting of emissions.


David Mabberley: The establishment of a British prison camp in Port Jackson in 1788, today's Sydney, as well-planned along European lines as it had been, was followed by a major problem for the fledgling white New South Wales, namely it imported more than it exported. For example, in 1811-12, merchandise imported from Calcutta was almost 20 times as valuable as exports to India. The search for goods for the Indian and Chinese markets led to coal being first sent to India in 1799, but timber helped too. Red cedar was sent as early as 1795, and oak, probably she-oak, by 1803.


The British Admiralty ordered that empty convict transports returning to England should carry cedar and other timbers. As early as 1795, there were government attempts to control cedar getting. The first organised fellings in the Hunter Valley where in 1801. The best cedar, resembling Honduras mahogany, was considered to be that from the Hunter. It was used for doors, window frames, furniture, coffins, for boat building and light vehicles and even for the panelling in Sydney's trams. Red cedar trees to 60 metres tall were formally plentiful on the alluvial flats of the larger rivers of New South Wales.


In 1829 a Scottish journalist Robert Mudie wrote prophetically of it as 'the most esteemed timber and would probably continue so until the forest be exhausted.' In fact it was almost entirely worked out, and today stands survive only in scattered remote localities in New South Wales and Queensland.


More pervasive in Australia are the eucalypts or gum trees, a term coined by Joseph Banks. According to government records, in 2013, eucalypts made up three-quarters of Australia's forests and woodlands, 92 million hectares. The first eucalypt to be grown out doors in Europe was a swamp mahogany, Eucalyptus robusta. It was planted north of Naples in Italy in 1792 and was being grown under glass in New York by 1811. In 1827 it was noted of Sydney blue gum, Eucalyptus saligna, that large quantities of it had been exported to England in the shape of plank, and that it was used locally in ship building, beams in houses, furniture and fence posts. By the 1860s, eucalypts were being used for paper production, for which their fibres are well suited.


Of the 800 or more eucalypt species in Australia, over 200 have been established in cultivation elsewhere. The tallest planted trees in the southern hemisphere are Sydney blue gums, planted in South Africa in 1906. They are also the tallest of all trees in all of Africa.


Blue gum, Eucalyptus globulus, a Tasmanian species extending to Victoria, has had the greatest global impact, reaching Africa in 1828 as nine seedlings via Mauritius. Blue gums are usually planted for paper pulp, and the timber is used in construction and charcoal making, but they have become invasive in many countries. They were introduced to California in the 1850s with the gold rush, and large-scale plantings began in the 1870s. In the 1860s, trees were established in Portugal and likely in Spain, even before that. The landscape of these countries, as also of much of North Africa, India, the eastern Mediterranean where they were planted to drain malarial swamps, Madagascar, Brazil, Colombia, Peru, Chile, and Ecuador has been transformed, though eucalypt plantings in Ecuador at least have removed pressure on native forests for firewood.


Blue gum is very successful in Africa at high elevations, as in Ethiopia, which had 250,000 hectares of it by 1993 contributing to Africa's total of 1,636,000 hectares, approaching double the area of natural stands in Australia. The very productive plantations used as a source of fuel enabled the first permanent capital, Addis Ababa, to be settled. In Australia, blue gum makes up 65% of all plantation hardwood, occupying perhaps 450,000 hectares. The total area of eucalypt plantations in Australia grew from almost nothing in 1998 to about a million hectares by 2008, spurred by a massive influx of finance, encouraged by the Managed Investments Act of 1998, which turned plantations into tax effective investments. But the global financial crisis of 2008 to 2009 saw off many of the companies involved.


With a bad reputation in many parts of the world because of invasiveness, eucalypts, some 14 species, have become naturalised in Europe, as have Australian species of hakea and 10 of acacia, wattles. Acacia, with about 1,053 species, is by far Australia's largest genus of plants. According to the government records, acacia forest is second only to eucalyptus forest, occupying in 2013 some 9.8 million hectares or 8% of the forest estate. The genus acacia occurs in all climatic regions of Australia and has a wide range of ecological tolerances. It has long been used as a food source and medicine, and for making tools and weapons. Golden wattle is in the national floral emblem, and the green and gold of acacias form the sporting colours for Australia.


Today, acacia species are perhaps used not so much in Australia for ornament as for soil rehabilitation because they fix nitrogen in their root nodules. Many species are grown in plantations in tropical and subtropical regions for industrial wood and for the bark, rich in tannin. They are increasingly important for fast-growing firewood and biomass. Australian blackwood, Acacia melanoxylon, is the best-known and most valuable temperate acacia timber species. It is commercially harvested in Tasmania, but most of the plantation timber on the world market is grown in South Africa, Chile and New Zealand. Black wattle bark from our Acacia mearnsii is a major source of commercial tannin used for leatherwork and adhesives, but Australia imports it from other countries.


In Australia itself, there were, even in the early 19th century, rising concerns about possible local extinctions of plants in the Sydney area. The scale of land clearing in many British territories, already with Europeanised agricultural systems, led the director of Kew Gardens in England to write: 'Many of the small local genera of Australia, New Zealand and South Africa will ultimately disappear, owing to the usurping tendencies of the emigrant plants of the northern hemisphere, energetically supported as they are by the artificial aids that the northern races of man afford them.'


By 1900, around 35% of New South Wales had been cleared or partly so, while 75% of the nation's rainforest had already gone. By the 1990s, some 300,000 tree ferns and grass trees were taken annually from the wild by the landscaping industry. Now over 1,000 Australian plant species are listed as vulnerable, and around 70 seed plant species are already extinct. However, contrary to the forebodings, the only planet genius to have been lost is Streblorrhiza, an attractive legume from Norfolk Island in the 19th century, and neither New Zealand nor South Africa has so far lost any.


Robyn Williams: Dr David Mabberley in the Blue Mountains. His book, Botanical Revelation: European Encounters with Australian Plants Before Darwin, will soon once more be in our shops. And yes, clearing land has just been removed as a dodge for our emissions accounting, our Kyoto subterfuge.

zondag 27 december 2020

How humans have changed natural environments

How humans have changed natural environments

On The Science Show with Robyn Williams

Download How humans have changed natural environments (10.84 MB)

Download 10.84 MB

Wherever you look the effect of human influence is seen in the natural environment. David Mabberley describes the impact, such as the Australian Aborigines’ use of fire and the use of bison by native North Americans which is thought to have extended the prairies. In Africa, human pressure on the environment including poaching is seeing the decline of pachyderms such as elephants, rhinoceros, or hippopotamus, and other animals, and plants reliant on them for dispersal. In Britain, there is no original vegetation left other than the odd mountain top or sea cliff.

Painting by Numbers The life and art of Ferdinand Bauer

Author: David Mabberley

Published by NewSouth Books

Speaker

David Mabberley

Former Director Royal Botanic Garden Sydney

Presenter

Robyn Williams

Producer

David Fisher

Duration: 7min 53sec

Broadcast: Sat 5 Dec 2020, 12:01pm


Robyn Williams: We end with another book and another author in this year of Captain Cook. Remember him? Dr David Mabberley takes us back to those European beginnings in Australia.


David Mabberley: When Lieutenant James Cook came to Australia in 1770, he and his naturalist super-cargo, Joseph Banks, were surprised by the relative openness of the vegetation at Botany Bay, as was their natural history artist Sydney Parkinson who wrote, 'The trees, quite free from underwood, appeared like plantations in a gentleman's park.' Everywhere Cook and other European commentators wrote of smoke from fires set by Aboriginal people. These observations are but a small part of the huge corpus of literature and illustrations brought together by Bill Gammage to make the compelling case for the ancient very heavy fire management and therefore enormous botanical modification of eastern Australia by Aboriginal people, long before European settlement.


The first Australians had modified, largely by fire it would seem, the Australian landscape, such that they could coexist in an apparently sustainable way with the plants and animals here. In many parts of the country, the highly modified vegetation known as a fire climax, dominated by those of the original tree species adapted to fire regimes due to lightning, expanded symbiotically with the clever new bipeds, at the expense of less fire tolerant species.


With the opening up of the vegetation and their increasing prominence, grasses, adapted to tolerance of grazing marsupials palatable to humans, were therefore maintained in the landscape because their usual ecological successors, trees, would have been nibbled away as seedlings.


The human/fire/grass/grazing-animal system is not unique to Australia, but by the time of the first Dutch and British arrivals here, the first Australians had had tens of thousands of years to reach such a kind of mutualistic equilibrium. But it would be foolish to have some kind of rosy Rousseau-esque view of that first human infiltration of the continent. As it was to be with later European conquest, there is likely to have been a number of casualties in terms of animal and plant extinctions. It is still hotly debated as to how much of the original megafauna, for example, was helped on its way, but the story in other parts of the world suggest that the arrival of the first humans had, as usual, a devastating effect.


Humans are good at ecosystem modification, sometimes with disastrous consequences for them and the rest of the environment. In terms of the well-known collapse of civilisations like the Maya, but the speed with which this modification happened in the distant past is shown by the example of Europe. With the withdrawal of the ice sheets at the end of the last glaciation, the tundra vegetation was grazed by animals, including mammoths, and we know what happened to them! In an urbanising Africa and Asia today, we are now witnessing the similar end of the pachyderms, besides many, many other animals and associated plants reliant on them for disbursal.


In Europe, as it warmed, there came a forest maximum. But if you travelled to, say, Britain today, there is no original forest, in fact no original vegetation left at all, save perhaps on a few mountaintops and sea cliffs. The whole North European landscape is an artefact of just 10,000 years of human activity, and such landscapes were those over much of eastern and other coastal Australia in 1770. What is surprising in Europe is that the richest habitats today include grasslands with orchids and other small plants that must've been very rare in the forest maximum and are maintained by the incisors of introduced animals, particularly sheep. Take away the sheep, and a species-poor secondary scruffy woodland appears.


Similarly, native North Americans extended the prairies through their management of bison. The eastern United States was in fact less wooded than it is today, and firewood was a precious resource, so that the locals on seeing Europeans arrive by ship drew the reasonable conclusion that the settlers must've run out of firewood at home, the only good reason to move away.


Similarly, in the upper Blue Mountains where I live, the forest surrounded settlements, now called Blackheath and Mount Victoria, were visited by Governor Macquarie in 1815. He named them Hounslow Heath and One Tree Hill. You do not give such names to heavily forested places.


The botanical revelation that comprised the European recording of Australia's plants from 1606 until the arrival here of Charles Darwin in 1836 was the result of a combination of pursuits with different motives. The initial search for riches comparable with those in South America yielded little, Terra Australis turning out to be a largely arid continent with no crops suited to European agriculture, while the immense mineral wealth of Australia remained largely hidden.


Then came the concern about rival spheres of influence of European powers in the Pacific, especially Britain and France, the real reason for major expeditions being dispatched and land claimed. Incidental to establishing such presences was the collecting of natural productions, usually with a hope that these would be resources to allow colonies to survive without financial support from their European masters.


Charles Darwin visited Australia in 1836 and later in his monumental book, Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication, effectively the evidence for much of his theory of natural selection in the hastily drawn up Origin of Species, he wrote of the potentially economic plants in Australia: 'It has often been remarked that we do not owe a single useful plant to Australia or the Cape of Good Hope or to New Zealand. Their plants have not been improved and consequently cannot compete with those which have been cultivated and improved during thousands of years in Europe.'


Similarly blinkered, shortly afterwards Thomas Livingstone Mitchell misinterpreted Aboriginal grain harvesting for hay making, when in fact there was what has now been posited as an Aboriginal grain belt right across the interior of the country, with grindstones argued to have been made up to 25,000 years ago.


It is true that internationally traded edible Australian commodities comprise products from species encountered by Europeans after Darwin's visit and that he was echoing opinions considered irrefutable. In fact, at first the most useful species commercially were the timbers, most of which were then still to be described scientifically. Such included red cedar, Toona ciliata, especially from the Hunter Valley, hoop pine, Araucaria cunninghamii, from the Brisbane area, and many eucalypts, Sydney blue gum, Eucalyptus saligna, being said to be the most generally useful of all the Australian woods.


Robyn Williams: Dr David Mabberley, former director of our oldest scientific institution, the Royal Botanic Garden, Sydney. His books are superb. The Florilegium is available any day now.